How long does it take to get a U.S. patent? There is no single timetable. The application type, technology, USPTO workload, examination issues, and applicant responses all affect the time involved. Preparing an application and waiting for examination are separate stages. The USPTO patent dashboard reports first Office action and total pendency separately. Those averages describe groups of applications and do not predict when a particular patent will issue. Filing an application does not guarantee a patent.
The time it takes for each step in the patent application process to be completed depends on how much time is needed to search, review, evaluate, draw, write, and review before filing. Before the initial filing to the USPTO, it will likely take weeks to complete a prior art search and patentability study, get the figures drawn, and write the claims, specification, and abstract even when preparing with a patent practitioner (patent attorney or patent agent).
Important Tip: There are several ways of getting patent applications prosecuted faster through the USPTO. Read more about getting your patent application prosecuted faster in our article on accelerating patent applications.
Carson Patents
Patent Practitioners Can Help Minimize Delays in the Process to Get a Patent
The patent application process to get a patent allowed and issued is based on a complex set of laws, regulations, policies, and procedures. Therefore, working with a patent practitioner (patent attorney or patent agent) is recommended in order to be time efficient. Their experience and knowledge of the details and deadlines is useful to avoid time delays. Though it is possible to file a patent pro se, it may result in more time due to the research required to write and file a complete and proper response to an office action from the USPTO – especially if unexperienced.
Office Actions and Other Sources of Delay
Missing information, formal defects, and unresolved examination issues can add time and expense. Office actions are also a normal part of examination and do not necessarily mean the application was prepared incorrectly. After a final rejection, options may include an appropriate after-final response, an appeal, or a request for continued examination (RCE) where available. The appropriate response depends on the application and prosecution history; an RCE is not automatically required after a fixed number of Office actions.
Read each USPTO communication carefully. Where a response is required, it must address the issues raised and meet the applicable deadline. Failure to submit a timely, adequate response can result in abandonment. Available extensions or remedies depend on the communication and application; consult a registered practitioner promptly.
What Kind or Type of Patent Application Impacts Time to Final Decision
Application type affects both preparation and examination. Utility, design, and plant applications have different requirements. A provisional application is an initial filing option that is not examined on the merits; it is not available for design inventions and does not itself mature into an issued patent.
Compare the USPTO’s statistics for the relevant application type rather than using one average for all patents. The technology, examination workload, claim scope, and issues raised during examination can affect timing. A shorter preparation period does not necessarily mean faster examination or easier allowance.
Provisional Patent Applications Can Extend Time to Final Decision
A provisional patent application can establish an earlier filing date for adequately disclosed subject matter. A later application must properly claim that benefit, and its claims must be supported by the provisional disclosure. The provisional filing does not start substantive examination.
A physical prototype is not generally required to file. The application must adequately describe the invention and explain how to make and use it, with necessary drawings. An unsupported idea or an incomplete disclosure may fail to support later claims.
The normal deadline to file a corresponding nonprovisional application claiming a provisional application’s benefit is 12 months after the provisional filing date. Waiting to file the nonprovisional can delay the start of substantive examination. The provisional application’s 12-month pendency is not extended by waiting.
If a corresponding U.S. nonprovisional application is filed after 12 months but within 14 months of the provisional filing, restoration of the provisional filing-date benefit may be available when the delay was unintentional and the petition requirements are satisfied. This restores a benefit claim; it does not revive or extend the provisional application. Restoration is not automatic and should not be treated as a planned extension. See the USPTO restoration requirements.
Non-Provisional Applications Start the Examination Process
A provisional application is not examined and does not itself become a patent. A corresponding nonprovisional application starts the route toward substantive examination. Both filings require adequate disclosure to support the subject matter for which a filing-date benefit is sought; preparation time depends on the invention and available materials.
After filing, review the application’s status and the USPTO’s published examination information. Any estimate depends on the application’s classification and current workload and is not a promised examination date.
Patent Application Process Time Ranges
A patent practitioner can help prepare a complete application, address examination issues, and meet response deadlines, reducing avoidable delays. Ordinary representation does not place an application ahead of others in the USPTO queue. The preparation estimates below describe stages of our process; they are not USPTO examination deadlines or guarantees of allowance.
A prior art search and patentability assessment can help inform a filing decision. We provide an estimated schedule based on the disclosure, technology, search scope, and references found. A search cannot guarantee that every relevant reference will be located or that a patent will issue.
Application preparation includes claim drafting, the written description, necessary drawings, and review with the inventor. We estimate the schedule after assessing the disclosure and deadlines. Read about patent application writing and how to write a patent application.
If filing a non-provisional application, the patent application will be placed in a queue where it will eventually be reviewed on the merits by a patent examiner. How long this part of the process takes heavily depends on whether the applicant filed a utility, design, or plant patent and what the invention is. Each type of application is placed into a different queue or art unit for examination. Each art unit at the USPTO has its own different docket of cases and number of staff. The backlog varies within an art unit over time determined by the non-provisional patent applications submitted.
The USPTO’s first Office action pendency measures the interval from filing to the first Office action. Total pendency measures time to final disposition, which may be issuance or abandonment; the dashboard separately reports a measure including RCEs. Neither is a guarantee of patent issuance. An examiner’s final rejection does not necessarily end the application: timely further action may remain available, depending on the case.